What criteria an "open" gadget should fulfilFirmwareThe advantages of open firmware are listed in the previous chapter. The following criteria should be met as far as possible:
SoftwareIf additional software is required besides the firmware to operate a device, this must work with open, non proprietary software!HardwareHardware must be repairable, so the following should apply:
ElectronicsThe following should apply to the electronic components:
PatentsShort note on the subject:No, a person that is granted a patent is not necessarily an inventor! Patent offices neither check whether an invention is new, nor whether the submitter is the (first) inventor, nor really whether the patent needed a major intellectual effort to write. If you don't believe that, you should read the patent application forms carefully - including the small print, the footnotes and the linked documents. My personal assessment: Technical development also takes place without patents! The best example are the FDM 3D printers that emerged from the open, patent-free RepRap movement. I therefore react particularly sensitively when a manufacturer of these printers claims patents for themselves and thus undermines the free access he had to all previous technology! WebseiteDoes the manufacturer operate a website and offer current firmware and the source code of this current firmware on it? Is advertised with owning patents on a device?
| ||||